Mark D. Walters
  • Home
  • About
  • Speaking
  • MDWBlog
  • NWBRT

Trademark Infringement - Likelihood of Confusion Standard 

3/1/2017

 
The objective of trademark law is to help consumers identify the sources of goods and services.  In a trademark infringement case, it is best to have evidence of actual consumer confusion, meaning consumers think they are dealing with Company A, when they are really dealing with Company B.  That said, you do not need evidence of actual consumer confusion.  The standard is "likelihood of confusion." The similarity of the marks is likely to confuse customers about the source of the goods or services. Washington courts use an eight-factor test articulated by the Ninth Circuit to evaluate the likelihood of confusion:
  1. the similarity of the marks;
  2. the relatedness of the two companies' services; 
  3. the marketing channel used;
  4. the strength of the party claiming infringement mark; 
  5. the intent of the alleged infringing party in selecting its mark;
  6. evidence of actual confusion; 
  7. the likelihood of expansion into other markets; and
  8. the degree of care to be exercised by purchasers.
Contact Mark D. Walters    

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Commercia Lease
    Contracts
    Copyright
    Corporations
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Defamation
    Employment Law
    Landlord/Tenant
    Law Biz
    Limited Liability Companies
    Litigation
    Non Compete Agreements
    Non-Compete Agreements
    Privacy
    Trademarks
    Trade Secrets

Copyright  | Mark D. Walters | All Rights Reserved

  • Home
  • About
  • Speaking
  • MDWBlog
  • NWBRT